Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 47 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser and Volvo XC90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 356 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |