Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 37 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 216 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 14.1 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Used also on Lexus LX, Lexus GX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 10 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 936 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |