Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mercedes ML) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 5.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 136 HP less power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2010 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`350 kg | 2`900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |