Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 67 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 291 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |