Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs BMW X5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 109 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 90 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 391 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
BMW X5 has
| |