Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Nissan Patrol 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 22 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, but torque is 12 NM less than Nissan Patrol. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.2 | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 2 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Patrol engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser is 67 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 605 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
840 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 155 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |