Toyota Land Cruiser 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 343 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 71 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 49 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |