Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 208 HP | |
Torque: | 298 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 14.5 | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 92 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 830 litres | 1080 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 830 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 2050 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 680 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`960 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 12 000 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |