Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
1990 - 1992
Mitsubishi Pajero
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol3.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 156 HP208 HP
Torque: 298 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.5 seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.614.5
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 95 litres92 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.72 m
Width: 1.90 m1.78 m
Height: 1.87 m1.90 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but slightly lower.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 830 litres1080 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data1080 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 830 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1370 litres2050 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 680 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Gross weight: 2`960 kg3`300 kg
Net weight:2`140 kg2`085 kg
Load capacity:820 kg1`215 kg
Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 48 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12 4004200
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Pajero has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv