Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1999

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
1990 - 1992
Jeep Cherokee
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 156 HP192 HP
Torque: 298 NM305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 36 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Jeep Cherokee.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.612.3
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 495 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 95 litres76 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway640 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.25 m
Width: 1.90 m1.76 m
Height: 1.87 m1.63 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 53 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 14 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 24 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 830 litres932 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litres1954 litres
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 102 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 584 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`9602`223
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12 6003600
Pros and Cons:
    Jeep Cherokee has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv