Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 engine produces 48 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, whereas torque is 132 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 11.1 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 830 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`960 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |