Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Land Rover Defender 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 253 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Land Rover Defender. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 18.1 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 440 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 2.04 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but lower. Toyota Land Cruiser is 18 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 830 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`960 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |