Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 24 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser and Volvo XC90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1886 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`350 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`640 kg | 2`078 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 710 kg | 672 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 54 600 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |