Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus LX | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser and Volvo XC90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1868 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`350 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 54 600 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |