Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 vs Jeep Cherokee 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Cherokee) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 49 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 19 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 16.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 460 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 51 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 2.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |