Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 vs Jeep Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 56 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 10 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.3 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee 1999 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 50 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 932 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1954 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`223 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |