Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Blazer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 54 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 13.7 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 14 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |