Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 208 HP | |
Torque: | 241 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 105 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 14.5 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 92 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but lower. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 10 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 9400 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |