Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 vs Jeep Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 241 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 89 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 12.3 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee 1999 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 50 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 12 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 932 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1954 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`223 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |