Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 387 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 36 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 34 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.8 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 254 mm (10 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Tundra | Used also on Chrysler Pacifica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 548 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1059 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 73 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`900 kg | 2`546 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 42 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |