Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota RAV4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 187 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine Toyota RAV4 2013 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 27 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 44 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`087 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 50 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |