Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 223 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 340 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6, BMW X7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 645 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 24 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 54 000 | 60 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
BMW X5 has
| |