Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 58 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Land Cruiser has 253 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 52 400 | 47 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |