Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 217 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used also on Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 27 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 44 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`087 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 53 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |