Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 109 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 103 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 161 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`812 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 53 800 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |