Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 16 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, but torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.6 | |
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.66 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 845 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 224 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 600 | 41 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |