Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2017 -
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 177 HP249 HP
Torque: 450 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds7.6 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 72 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.9
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres86 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle1240 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1360 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Toyota HiluxInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.88 m
Width: 1.86 m2.07 m
Height: 1.85 m1.80 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 621 litres780 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space.
Toyota Land Cruiser has 159 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`9903`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 54 00063 200
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv