Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 129 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 780 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 159 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 52 200 | 56 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |