Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Jeep Wrangler) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 93 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 4.1 l/100km + 23.9 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 16.30 € | 15.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/lPetrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 274 mm (10.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 548 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1059 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 73 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`990 kg | 2`903 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`165 kg | 2`334 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 825 kg | 569 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Jeep Wrangler. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 000 | 39 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |