Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 83 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 898 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 277 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 52 000 | 45 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |