Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 83 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 274 mm (10.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 548 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1059 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 73 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`990 kg | 2`765 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`165 kg | 2`205 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 825 kg | 560 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Jeep Wrangler. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 000 | 36 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |