Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 163 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 250 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 29 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`990 kg | 2`940 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`165 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 825 kg | 740 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than BMW X5. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 43 800 | 50 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
BMW X5 has
| |