Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Lexus RX 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 137 HP less power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 9.0 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Toyota Tacoma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 924 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Lexus RX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 1010 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 2`656 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`095 kg | 1`987 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 755 kg | 669 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Lexus RX. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 000 | 41 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Lexus RX has
| |