Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 87 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 119 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 7.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 748 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1811 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 127 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 123 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 200 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |