Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Kia Sportage 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 6.8 | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 720 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Land Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.65 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 36 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1492 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 118 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 53 800 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |