Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Nissan Patrol 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 303 NM | 363 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 8 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, but torque is 60 NM less than Nissan Patrol. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 5.01 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser is 28 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 20 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 1150 litres | 810 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 810 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1150 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`710 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
| |