Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Mercedes ML 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 303 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 40 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 13.8 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1150 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`710 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |