Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 38 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 362 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 897 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |