Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 9 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 5 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.63 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 48 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1315 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 90 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 165 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |