Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Lexus RX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 76 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 12 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 13.0 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.66 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1725 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 253 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Lexus RX, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Lexus RX has
| |