Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Jeep Wrangler 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 7 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 109 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 19 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 85 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1515 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 427 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 365 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |