Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Ford Maverick 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser and Ford Maverick have the same engine power, but Toyota Land Cruiser torque is 17 NM more than Ford Maverick. Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.5 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |