Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 59 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 115 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the BMW X5, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 277 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
BMW X5 has
| |