Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.5 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 104 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 509 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |