Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 45 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 874 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |