Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 7 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 2091 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 411 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 161 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |