Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 72 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |