Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Land Rover Defender 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 51 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Land Rover Defender. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
| |