Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 4 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 79 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 253 mm (10 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 2322 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.25 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.65 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |