Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 45 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Commander. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1940 litres | |
|
Jeep Commander has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 108 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 10 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |