Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 243 HP | |
Torque: | 246 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 80 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 74 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 500'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Hilux, Toyota Tacoma | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 104 litres | 600 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1837 litres | |
In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 496 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 93 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`760 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 200 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |