Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 vs Ford Explorer 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 303 NM | 344 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 34 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 13.0 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |